Introduction--

Contents of these web pages are presented for informational and educational purposes only. Author of this web site disclaims any liability for the use readers make of the information presented herein or for damage caused by hardware resulting from information contained within these web pages.

 

After two years of working with PVC in the construction of solid propellant rocket engines, it occurred to me the possibility of making an all PVC hybrid rocket engine. What motivated such an endeavor was:

  • The versatility and availability of PVC.
  • That the pressure stress involved in hybrid systems seemed within the boundaries of PVC.
  • Of course, the challenge of trying something unusual and new.

An unavoidable question pups up: Why make a hybrid engine that is not reusable? Two answers come to mind:

  1. Why not.
  2. Same reason one makes a non reusable solid engine.

In reality PVC is cheap, easy to work and a good medium to learn.

If you need to know about hybrid rocket principles:
Hybrid Rocket Science
Univdersity of Illinois Project Prometheus - A Hybrid Rocket Motor

Perhaps some history:
Amateur Hybrid Genesis
by Bob Fortune and Bill Colburn.

Based on previews work done on PVC engines, I decided that the prototype all PVC engine would be done on 1.5" schedule 40 tubing. After asking around for basic hybrid specs, I found out that a typical hybrid engine works within the following parameters:

  1. Chamber pressure between 150 and 400 psi (10.34 and 27.57 bar)
  2. Oxidizer tank pressure between 460 and 1000 psi (31.71 and 68.94 bar) dependent on temperature (see table 3).

Next I proceeded to calculate the structural properties of the 1.5" schedule 40 PVC I was intending to use. For this I used two methods:

  1. A program written by Richard Nakka (casing.xls)
  2. A procedure outlined in John H. Wickman's book "How to make amateur rockets" Motor Structural Analysis - chapter 7

Here are the results of both procedures.

From Harvel Plastics Inc. ( http://www.harvel.com/pipepvc-sch40-80-dim.asp ) I got this table:

PVC Schedule 40
 Nominal Pipe Size (in)
 O.D.
 Average I.D.
 Min. Wall
 Nominal Wt./Ft.
 Max. W.P. PSI**
 1/8
.405
.261
.068
.045
 810
1/4
.540
.354
.088
.081
 780
3/8
.675
.483
.091
.109
 620
1/2
.840
.608
.109
.161
600
3/4
1.050
.810
.113
.214
480
1
1.315
1.033
.133
.315
450
1-1/4
1.660
1.364
.140
.426
370
1 -1/2
1.900
1.592
.145
.509
330
2
2.375
2.049
.154
.682
280
2-1/2
2.875
2.445
.203
1.076
300
3
3.500
3.042
.216
1.409
260
3-1/2
4.000
3.520
.226
1.697
240
4
4.500
3.998
.237
2.006
220
5
5.563
5.017
.258
2.726
190
6
6.625
6.031
.280
3.535
180
8
8.625
7.943
.322
5.305
160
10
10.750
9.976
.365
7.532
140
12
12.750
11.890
.406
9.949
130
14
14.000
13.072
.437
11.810
130
16
16.000
14.940
.500
15.416
130
18
18.000
16.809
.562
20.112
130
20
20.000
18.743
.593
23.624
120
24 24.000 22.544 687 32.873 120
Table 1

After plugging the numbers into the casing.xls spreadsheet The results were (Illustration 1):


Illustration1

On the other hand, according to John Wickman's book :"How to make amateur rockets"

Min. Wall Thickness = [(MEOP) * (Chamber Diameter)] / [ 2 * (Ultimate Tensile Strength)]

Where MEOP = Maximum Expected Operating Pressure
The Ultimate Tensile Strength for PVC = 5,000 psi (344.73 bar).

Moving the equation around.

MEOP =[ Min. Wall Thickness * 2(5,000) ] / Chamber Diameter

MEOP = [ 0.145 * 10,000 ] / 1.592 = 910.80 psi = 62.79 bar

All these numbers are indicative that the PVC engine chamber and oxidizer tank are viable.

The first part of the project then was to get a feel for the oxidizer and see how it behaved with different fuels, at the same time to learn how to prevent it from burning the PVC (which is frequently used as fuel in other systems).

Next, to pressure up a PVC oxidizer tank to see if it could hold.

Finally, to put everything together, perform a static test, evaluate the results and ....

| Intrduction | Oxidizer | Fuel | Tank | Assembly | Test Stand |
| Static Test | Results | News | Post a Message | Links | Spanish |

| Send mail here |