An unavoidable question
pups up: Why make a hybrid engine that is not reusable? Two answers
come to mind:
- Why not.
- Same reason one makes
a non reusable solid engine.
In reality PVC is cheap,
easy to work and a good medium to learn.
If you need to know about
hybrid rocket principles:
Hybrid
Rocket Science
Univdersity
of Illinois Project Prometheus - A Hybrid Rocket Motor
Perhaps some history:
Amateur Hybrid Genesis
by
Bob Fortune and Bill
Colburn.
Based on previews work
done on PVC engines, I decided that the prototype all PVC engine
would be done on 1.5" schedule 40 tubing. After asking around
for basic hybrid specs, I found out that a typical hybrid engine
works within the following parameters:
- Chamber pressure between
150 and 400 psi (10.34 and 27.57 bar)
- Oxidizer tank pressure
between 460 and 1000 psi (31.71 and 68.94 bar) dependent on temperature
(see table 3).
Next I proceeded to calculate
the structural properties of the 1.5" schedule 40 PVC I was
intending to use. For this I used two methods:
- A program written
by Richard
Nakka (casing.xls)
- A procedure outlined
in John H. Wickman's book "How
to make amateur rockets" Motor Structural Analysis -
chapter 7
Here are the results
of both procedures.
From Harvel Plastics
Inc. ( http://www.harvel.com/pipepvc-sch40-80-dim.asp
) I got this table:
|
|
Nominal Pipe Size (in) |
O.D. |
Average I.D. |
Min. Wall |
Nominal Wt./Ft. |
Max. W.P. PSI** |
| 1/8 |
.405 |
.261 |
.068 |
.045 |
810 |
| 1/4 |
.540 |
.354 |
.088 |
.081 |
780 |
| 3/8 |
.675 |
.483 |
.091 |
.109 |
620 |
| 1/2 |
.840 |
.608 |
.109 |
.161 |
600 |
| 3/4 |
1.050 |
.810 |
.113 |
.214 |
480 |
| 1 |
1.315 |
1.033 |
.133 |
.315 |
450 |
| 1-1/4 |
1.660 |
1.364 |
.140 |
.426 |
370 |
| 1 -1/2 |
1.900 |
1.592 |
.145 |
.509 |
330 |
| 2 |
2.375 |
2.049 |
.154 |
.682 |
280 |
| 2-1/2 |
2.875 |
2.445 |
.203 |
1.076 |
300 |
| 3 |
3.500 |
3.042 |
.216 |
1.409 |
260 |
| 3-1/2 |
4.000 |
3.520 |
.226 |
1.697 |
240 |
| 4 |
4.500 |
3.998 |
.237 |
2.006 |
220 |
| 5 |
5.563 |
5.017 |
.258 |
2.726 |
190 |
| 6 |
6.625 |
6.031 |
.280 |
3.535 |
180 |
| 8 |
8.625 |
7.943 |
.322 |
5.305 |
160 |
| 10 |
10.750 |
9.976 |
.365 |
7.532 |
140 |
| 12 |
12.750 |
11.890 |
.406 |
9.949 |
130 |
| 14 |
14.000 |
13.072 |
.437 |
11.810 |
130 |
| 16 |
16.000 |
14.940 |
.500 |
15.416 |
130 |
| 18 |
18.000 |
16.809 |
.562 |
20.112 |
130 |
| 20 |
20.000 |
18.743 |
.593 |
23.624 |
120 |
| 24 |
24.000 |
22.544 |
687 |
32.873 |
120 |
|
Table 1
|
After plugging the numbers
into the casing.xls
spreadsheet The results were (Illustration 1):

Illustration1
On the other hand, according
to John Wickman's book :"How
to make amateur rockets"
Min.
Wall Thickness = [(MEOP) * (Chamber Diameter)] / [ 2 * (Ultimate
Tensile Strength)]
Where MEOP = Maximum
Expected Operating Pressure
The Ultimate Tensile Strength for PVC = 5,000 psi (344.73 bar).
Moving the equation around.
MEOP =[ Min.
Wall Thickness * 2(5,000) ] / Chamber Diameter
MEOP = [ 0.145
* 10,000 ] / 1.592 = 910.80 psi = 62.79
bar
All these numbers are
indicative that the PVC engine chamber and oxidizer tank are viable.
The first part of the
project then was to get a feel for the oxidizer and see how it behaved
with different fuels, at the same time to learn how to prevent it
from burning the PVC (which is frequently used as fuel in other
systems).
Next, to pressure up
a PVC oxidizer tank to see if it could hold.
Finally, to put everything
together, perform a static test, evaluate the results and .... |